Yesterday, 2nd May 2012, there were 3 separate visits from the Police National Network to this site.

Whilst we have seen the Police visit this site on a regular basis (presumably to see what is going on, or what is being published here), yesterday they decided to take a copy of the entire site using Rippers software.

Our security systems automatically put a ban in place for any visitor using the Rippers software (it does not discriminate), and consequently the Police National Network on this particular IP address is now banned.

 Read more...

A Google Hollie Greig poster featured briefly but unmistakably in the first few seconds of tonight’s BBC1 News at 10 broadcast, in which the items to be covered were flagged up.

Then 2 more Hollie placards again showed up on BBC News London Today’s coverage of the protest demo outside the Independent Police Complaints Commission headquarters in High Holborn, of which members of Hollie’s army were participants and the current spokesperson for Hollie’s campaign for justice addressed the crowd, citing of course the Police Complaints Commission Scotland as being more within the sights of this campaign but there are strong issues with English police treatment of Hollie and her mother since they have been resident in Shropshire England, and with that meted out to their key supporters in cross-border raids in which English police collaborated with Scottish police.

 Read more...

Dear Shropshire Council,
 
Regretfully, I find that I have to contact you again in response to your reply in order to APPEAL against TWO of the answers you have provided and ask that you reconsider them and get back to me with accurate answers within the next 10 consecutive days.
 
I will explain my reasons for this appeal per question.
 
Question ONE:
The figure of £40 for 4 hours of attendance at the home of Anne & Hollie Greig by two Council employees, does not sound correct to me, as this would place both Council employees on a salary of just £5 an hour each – which is beneath the National Minimum wage for the year 2010.  If that figure is correct, then Shropshire Council is illegally under-paying its staff.  Please double check your figures and reply with the correct ones within the next 10 consecutive days.  You also state in your reply to Question ONE that the Council did not instigate the forced entry into Anne & Hollie’s home.  Documentary evidence exists to PROVE that it was Shropshire Council who approached West-Mercia Police Force and lied to them about Hollie being under the care of the Council and that both Anne & Hollie were ‘missing’.  This evidence can be produced in Open Court if you wish to contest this point further, which I openly challenge you on public here and now.  Therefore, by misleading the Police, the forced entry occurred illegally and, as such, was instigated by the Council.  You will recall that I asked in my initial FoIto you that you stop lying to me.  I ask you again,PLEASE STOP LYING TO ME!
 
Question TWO:
Response Accepted
 
Question THREE:
I am doubtful as to the accuracy of the figures you have provided as it is known that the Official Solicitor currently being employed by Shropshire Council to persecute Anne & Hollie is THE TENTH HIGHEST PAID BARRISTER IN THE LAND. Therefore, I request a full and complete breakdown of the figures quoted by the Council if the Council wishes to stand by the figures it has publicly presented.  Failing that, I request that the Council re-visit the figures and provide an accurate statement that clearly reflects those involved.  Given that Shropshire Council is known to have used THREE BARRISTERS in Court against Anne & Hollie, plus the matter of one being the tenth highest paid in the land, I simply cannot accept the figures presented by the Council and strongly suspect the true expenditure of the public’s money by the Council in persecution of Anne & Hollie to be much, much higher.  I must, therefore, ask the Council to provide evidence to support the Council’s claims within the next 10 consecutive days.  Again, as with Question ONE, I must ask the Council to PLEASE STOP LYING TO ME!  Shropshire Council’s credibility is already shot to pieces, constantly lying to the public in responses to Freedom of Information Requests only makes things appear an awful lot worse for the Council.  The intentions of Shropshire Council are perfectly clear to anyone following this case, so please do not try to insult my intelligence any further by suggesting that the Council has not taken action to try to remove Hollie from her mother, when both you (the Council) and I know different.
 
I am sure that the Council will appreciate the importance of this case and the relevance of the requested information.  So, there is now a great importance placed on the quality of the Council’s reply to this Appeal, a reply that should conform fully to the points…
 
All replies to this Freedom of Information Request APPEAL are on the following conditions:
·         All senders’ rights are reserved and none Assumpsit
·         All respondents affirm to the best of their knowledge full disclosure is provided with motives logically identified
·         All respondents affirm that any statements declared are honest and wilfully contain no non sequiturs
·         All respondents affirm full disclosure isprovided and no wilful attempt is made to make false or fraudulent declarations
·         All respondents affirm to the best of their knowledge under penalty of perjury that they have written the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God
·        Respondents accept this oath under the Statutory Declarations Act 1835.
 
I await your reply. Please don’t make me wait too long as I did not appreciate having my initial FoI request ignored, then being lied to when I finally got a reply, now having to endure a further delay in obtaining the correct information.  If I am not in possession of factually correct answers within 10 consecutive days, I shall take the matter further without further notice to the Council.

 Read more...

Although as he reminds us he isn’t in a position to check anything going on on the internet for himself, Robert has been informed that fresh attempts are being made to undermine Anne and raise doubts as to the truth of her and Hollie’s story.

You have to ask yourself, says Robert, why would there be such continuing interest on the part of those who remain unconvinced by Anne and Hollie’s story to discuss it at all? After all, it’s not a very nice story, is it? So most normal people, if they didn’t believe it or didn’t want to believe it would probably be far happier to shut it out of their minds altogether, wouldn’t they? They certainly wouldn’t be going on and on worrying at it like a dog with a bone, as these people currently going for Anne are doing.

 Read more...

Several people have kindly offered to drive Robert back home to Cheshire on 17th May and he very much appreciates these offers and would of course prefer to chat to one or two of us on the way home in the comfort of a car.

Unfortunately however he has to be back to a deadline in order to receive his electronic tag or ‘Home Detention Curfew’ – they don’t want any brawls in the local pub, do they. If he was in a car and that broke down it’s unlikely that such a situation would be looked on with much sympathy, given that he has already been issued with his train-ticket, he might even be re-arrested!

 Read more...

The rolling 2-week demo outside the Royal Courts of Justice London under the aegis of the Campaign for Truth and Justice http://www.ctjnet.co.uk/ and coinciding with the Leveson Inquiry within the RCJ is going great guns, despite the sky deciding to tip down on us this particular week every drop of water it has been withholding from the parched South East of UK since roughly 2011.

Here's a pic of us at the start of Day 1 of the demo, Monday, a very wet day, hence attendance a little thin (what's a bit of water, London activists?!)

 Read more...

MAY-DAY will be HOLLIE-DAY in London!

Message to troops from Belinda: Hollie’s issues will be part of a 10-day demo outside the Royal Courts of Justice, from Monday 23rd April to Friday 4th May.

The demo has been called by Caul Grant under the aegis of the Campaign for Truth and Justice http://www.ctjnet.co.uk/ and the aim is to draw public attention to the failings of the judiciary in general (I’m told certain judges against whom there are accusations of actual criminality backed by cast-iron evidence are going to be named) and to the shortcomings of the judicial system, very much including the family court system.

 Read more...

The good news has just come through from Robert that his custodial sentence will end and he will be FREE to go home early in the morning of 17th May. He received the news in the Governor’s office this afternoon and there has been much jubilation at Craiginches ever since.

He will still be under curfew when he gets home (7pm to 9am every night of the week) for 3 months and of course campaigning and so on is out but at least he’ll be able to go for walks and go on line and all the things he’s not been able to do.

 Read more...

…for responding as hoped to our leafleting drive at the weekend. Some 40,000 of you took our leaflet or received that through your letterboxes, leaving us with 20,000 still to distribute in a few days.

As this does not cater by a substantial margin for the whole population of Aberdeen which is over 200,000, we do hope people will share the information on the leaflet and direct their friends to this website.

 Read more...