Fighting the Government, protesting against wrongs or standing up for your rights will always be a difficult task to undertake, especially when all the cards are stacked against you.
If your protest, group or cause gains momentum, there are an army of government officials, lawyers and undercover operatives who are ready to attempt to destroy it, and if that fails, then to guide it into dead ends, or worst case into prison for those who dare to oppose the status quo.
We have all seen the government response against the environmental campaigners, and whether we agreed with the campaigners objectives or not, the methods used by the establishment to infiltrate, spoil from the inside and eventually to imprison those campaigners still beggars belief. That campaign alone outed 7 embedded police officers, the most famous of which was Mark Kennedy, and the repercussions of his defection is still being dealt with.
Then there is the case of Jim Boyling, embedded police officer in the Reclaim the Streets campaign. Boyling was undercover, using the name Jim Sutton, between 1995 and 2000 in the campaign Reclaim the Streets, which organised colourful, nonviolent demonstrations against the overuse of cars, such as blocking roads and holding street parties.
But the real damage is done when, as has now been exposed, Police Chiefs authorised undercover officers embedded in protest groups to give false evidence in court in order to protect their undercover status. When Boyling went into the witness box at the trial, he swore under oath that he was Sutton, and gave evidence under questioning from the barrister for the defendants and the prosecution, according to a legal note of the hearing.
As defence lawyers said at the time:
“This case raises the most fundamental constitutional issues about the limits of acceptable policing, the sanctity of lawyer-client confidentiality, and the integrity of the criminal justice system. At first sight, it seems that the police have wildly overstepped all recognised boundaries.”
So far in 2011, eight official inquiries have been set up to examine the conduct of police and prosecutors after the exposure of a network of police spies in political movements. We have little doubt they will change nothing.
But the practice still goes on, and ‘Hollie Demands Justice’ is just another campaign that has been heavily infiltrated over the past two years, spoiling campaign tactics and guiding the campaign to the point where Robert Green was jailed. There is still an ongoing effort to isolate Anne and Hollie from those closest to her, or goading Anne via email and the website in an attempt to make her say or do things that may break laws, rulings or court orders, making her and Hollie more vulnerable to the whims of those whose sole job is to shut them up using the powers of the State and secret courts.
So today we have decided that it is time to clear the decks a little. It is time that we presented the evidence on two of our own embedded infiltrators, primarily because another facebook group has gone rogue, where the supporters are shut out and the detractors are left to pull the admin strings giving free reign protecting the perpetrators of Hollies abuse. In the lead up to his imprisonment, the same individuals did exactly the same thing with Roberts blogspot.
In Scotland the key players around Robert Green are the one who calls himself John Taylor and his girlfriend Sarah McLeod.
John Taylor is not his real name, he told Robert that his real name was Stephen Milne, also an untruth. He claims to work in a builders merchants packing plaster board, also untrue.
It is our belief that he works for UKBA, the UK Border Agency at Aberdeen Airport. How do we come to this conclusion, from his internet footprint. We have had emails from him directly, we have comments from him on the HDJ site, and we have Contact Us forms from him. All of these methods collect the senders IP address.
Cross referencing that IP address with the HDJ and FRG system stats, we can clearly see that the IP address comes from high security air side communications equipment at Aberdeen Airport. It is supplied by SITA, (societe internationale telecommunications aeronautique), and at Aberdeen is supplied into only two areas of the airport. (I checked)
1. The Air traffic control room, for secure communications with other airports and direct links to aircraft.
2. The UKBA offices in the airport.
Here you see one of his visits earlier today. This is just one of many screengrabs of our system stats which clearly show that the IP address is owned by SITA. It is the same IP address in his emails and on comments. i.e. fully triangulated and confirmed.
Given the amount of time that he spends online, and the working pattern, we have concluded that he can only be using it from the UKBA area, and is not equipment available for use by civilians.
The Grey suit is ‘Taylor’. Other pics available including video.
His Girlfriend Sarah McLeod is a freelancer working for BBC Frontline Scotland, amongst her other activities, which mainly stem around her ‘art’, all freely referenced on the internet.
It was this woman, along with another in Liverpool whose background we will divulge in due course, who works occasionally as a freelancer for BBC Merseyside, that tried desperately to get the Buchanan expenses and time line documents in Belinda’s post called ‘Serendipity in Stonehaven’ taken down, both became abusive because they no longer had direct access to the HDJ website, Sarah referred to Anne as liar for spreading rumours about Buchanan, even though Buchanan’s lawyers has presented Robert with the documents, and the rest you have seen on both Roberts blog and now the Facebook page, which we understand is a page created on the Sarah McLeod personal Facebook profile.
You may also recall that at one of Robert’s interim diets in November 2011 there had been an appearance by a Scottish Sun reporter. In the days preceeding that hearing, Sarah McLeod wrote to Anne suggesting it would be a good idea if she wrote a post thanking Robert for all his help, even suggesting the wording. It was not until after that hearing the reason became clear. They all thought they had talked Robert into pleading guilty. He refused, his council walked away and the smear campaign against Robert began.
Before Robert’s jailing we obtained confirmation from both Robert and Belinda that it was Taylor/McLeod who set up Roberts blogspot, and provided him with microblogging software for his computer so that he could post, as at the technology level Robert is a self confessed dodo. This then left Taylor/McLeod as the only admins for his site as you cannot administer using microblogging software, only post/edit.
Over the past months Belinda has also confirmed that they took her email password in order to set her access up, and consequently we are aware that Belinda has had all her emails read before she receives them, on her btinternet account. She has now been issued with a holliedemandsjustice email address she can use when discussing campaign stuff.
For us the accumulated evidence, of which only some is presented here is overwhelming. Taylor/McLeod are embedded campaign disruptor’s, state paid (UKBA & BBC), and they have done the Hollie Demands Justice campaign and Robert Green an enormous amount of harm.
They now have a lack of inside campaign information, so they need to goad on whichever site they have admin rights to, Facebook, GL-W or Roberts own blog. Here at HDJ we have learned to starve them of that oxygen.
It is a situation that we see and hear repeatedly from other families fighting the system for their own children, children that are being purloined by the State in what is fast becoming evident as a business, now currently running at 10,000 a year, State run and operated child trafficking.
That the abuse and corruption is at the highest level amongst lawyers, judges, police officers, councillors, MPs and Ministers means that in their eyes campaigns like Hollie Demands Justice are dangerous, a security risk, not national security, but their own, so infiltrators will continue to be used.
We fully expect there will be a backlash from our publishing this information, more smears, more attacks on those around Anne, personal vilification, made up lies, false documents/emails/faxes etc purporting to come from Anne or her team.. but stick with us, there is more to come, there are others to out… we won’t take this State interference lying down.
And a backlash there has been. A whole raft of doctored emails, personal vilification by the bucket load, and questions raised over the accuracy of the technical proof.
We will ignore the vilification and emails for the moment, and answer some of the items raised by Taylor, and throw in a few more.
Firstly, he claims the IP address linked to his machine is based in Ireland, so lets deal with that one first. This is the ‘tool’ that was used to make their claim. http://www.reputationauthority.org/lookup.php?ip=126.96.36.199
Those location maps do not show the location of the individual terminal, they show you the
internet breakout point of the network you are on, in Taylors case, the SITA network, the point where the SITA network joins the rest of the WWW. It is also known as the Network Barrier Gateway and is designed to stop unwanted internet traffic. The SITA network operated from the IoM covers every airport in the UK&Ireland.
As an example, try putting your own IP address into that same software. You probably expect it to show where you live or where the PC you are using is located.
You can get your own IP address from here. http://whatismyipaddress.com/
What you actually see is where your own network provider (BTinternet, Sky, Virgin, etc) joins the rest of the WWW, not where you live. Our technical experts use much more professional equipment.
Secondly, Taylor/Milne, according to his facebook page, claims to work in a paper packaging factory, Mondi Packaging Aberdeen. Unfortunately Mondi have an exclusive contract with BT for the supply of all internet and email services, so any web browsing or emails would show up as the BT network not SITA.
Thirdly, lets look at the Milne facebook page. Needing to create a persona that could be shown to Robert, it was created in May 2010 as a page on the back of an older account, and given its own direct url when Facebook introduced those last year. But for those of you who have been around this campaign from the beginning, the name in this original facebook redirect url will be most significant.
We think that may be rather damning.